Search for: "SPOTIFY USA INC." Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2018, 10:00 pm
Spotify USA Inc., case number 2:17-cv-09288, in the U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 12:04 pm by Holly Brezee
Frensley recently ordered Spotify Chief Executive Officer Daniel Ek to sit for a deposition in the long-running copyright infringement suit between Spotify USA, Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Spotify USA, Inc. | Publications | Loeb & Loeb LLP https://t.co/fci4M7Q8kf 2019-11-12 Recent Court Decisions Boost the Outlook for Artificial Intelligence Patents https://t.co/Mx7MDar5xY 2019-11-12 Remembrance Day Poppies and Intellectual Property Controversies https://t.co/K7A6E38Zbn 2019-11-12 Territorial scope in recent CJEU cases: Google v CNIL / Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook – Cathryn Hopkins https://t.co/CI8TowkMAm 2019-11-12 Employee’s unauthorized… [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:53 am by Barry Sookman
Mar. 30, 2017) Tompkins v. 23andMe, Inc. 840 F.3d 1016 (9th.Cir.2016) Ingalls v Spotify USA, Inc 2016 WL 6679561 (N.D.Cal. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 5:15 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Sarkozy government allegedly caught red-handed infringing DVD copyrights (IP Watch) (IP Factor) District Court S D New York: Court rules that phones ringing in public don’t infringe copyright: USA v ASCAP (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Ars Technica) Microsoft asks Federal Circuit to reconsider presumption of patent… [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 4:15 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Sarkozy government allegedly caught red-handed infringing DVD copyrights (IP Watch) (IP Factor) District Court S D New York: Court rules that phones ringing in public don't infringe copyright: USA v ASCAP (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Ars Technica) Microsoft asks Federal Circuit to reconsider presumption of patent validity: Lucent v… [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 4:15 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Sarkozy government allegedly caught red-handed infringing DVD copyrights (IP Watch) (IP Factor) District Court S D New York: Court rules that phones ringing in public don't infringe copyright: USA v ASCAP (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Ars Technica) Microsoft asks Federal Circuit to reconsider presumption of patent validity: Lucent v… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:17 am by Eric Goldman
Because Rightscorp therefore cannot satisfy the notice requirements of Section 512(c)(3)(A), a subpoena cannot be issued under Section 512(h). * BWP Media USA, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Ben
The gripe is really with about the role of the two main collection societies in the USA, ASCAP and BMI, and the major music publishers now want to start negotiating the 'public performance' right with the main streaming services directly rather than through the collective licensing system. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 5:24 am by Kristian Soltes
District Judge Katherine Polk Failla said at the beginning of the month the proposed class could proceed with claims for breach of contract and inadequate disclosure against Chase Bank USA NA, but trimmed other disclosure-related claims brought under federal law. . . . [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
Spotify and Deezer are big in their sector, but dwarfed by the likes of Google. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
  Back in the USA, the music industry (mostly) supported two more new pieces of legislation, the CLASSICS Act, which was aimed at rectifying the much discussed pre-1972 quirk in American copyright law that excludes  earlier sound recordings, and the AMP Act, which would introduce a new right for record producers and sound engineers, and reform to the way satellite radio royalties are calculated, and provide a general performing right for sound recording copyright to rectify… [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
District Judge Colleen McMahon rejected Sirius’ arguments that Flo & Eddie Inc, controlled by founding band members Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, did not own copyrights in The Turtles’ recordings or that Sirius had an “implied” license to play Turtles' songs. [read post]